EST-24130-MIT · ALL-66-1142 · job J-10440
Robicheaux, Paul — storm/mitigation · Houma, LA · estimator Tyrell Joseph
Revision requested Our court overdue · 12d held · over 3d our response window round 2
Current RCV
$9,320
Approved
—
Rounds
2
Submitted
28d ago
Challenged
0
Revision thread — ball-in-court
Allstate · Carrier portalGRS (estimator)
↔
Allstate (auditor)
R1 · submitted Jun 29, 11:26 PM
Tarp + water extraction submitted day of loss.
+$9,320
R1 · auditor return Jul 1, 2:37 AM
Need moisture map + daily readings; O&P not warranted at this complexity.
+$0
DocsScope
DOCUMENTATION — Moisture Map Required: Auditor is requiring a moisture map to support the drying scope; daily moisture readings must also be provided to validate equipment placement, duration, and drying progress.
SCOPE — Overhead & Profit (O&P) Disputed: Auditor contends that the complexity of the loss does not warrant the application of Overhead & Profit (10%/10%), asserting the project does not meet the threshold requiring a general contractor to coordinate multiple trades.
held 1.1d before this
R2 · submitted Jul 16, 1:46 PM
Submitted to carrier.
+$0
held 15.5d before this
R2 · auditor return Jul 16, 1:47 PM
Need moisture map + daily readings; O&P not warranted at this complexity.
+$0
DocsScopeO&P
DOCUMENTATION — Moisture Map Missing: Auditor requires a moisture map showing affected areas, material types, and moisture readings by zone to substantiate the drying scope.
→ Attach a room-by-room moisture map (sketch or diagram) clearly labeling all affected materials, moisture meter reading locations, and initial/goal moisture content values. Export directly from Drybook, Moisture Mapper, or equivalent platform if available.
DOCUMENTATION — Daily Moisture Readings Not Provided: Auditor requires daily psychrometric and moisture content logs for the full duration of the drying project to validate equipment usage and drying progression.
→ Attach complete daily monitoring logs for every day equipment was on-site, including date/time, room, material readings (wood moisture equivalent and reference), temperature, relative humidity, GPP, and dew point. Drybook, Encircle, or similar field logs are acceptable.
OP_DISPUTE — Overhead & Profit Challenged: Auditor asserts the project does not meet sufficient complexity or coordination requirements to warrant the standard 10% overhead and 10% profit markup.
→ Provide a written justification documenting GC coordination requirements: number of subcontrades coordinated (e.g., plumber, electrician, restoration trades), project duration, permit management, supervision hours, and any complexity factors (occupied structure, multi-system involvement, code upgrades). Reference Xactimate's O&P guidance and applicable case precedent (e.g., Xactware's published position on O&P applicability in restoration claims).
held 0.0d before this
Line items
0 challenged| Code | Description | Rnd | State | RCV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFG TARP | Tarp - per SF (labor & mat) | 0 | accepted | $1,860 |
| WTR EXTR | Water extraction | 0 | accepted | $2,100 |
Record
estimate = collection root{
"estimate": {
"id": "est_EST-24130-MIT",
"estimateNo": "EST-24130-MIT",
"claimNo": "ALL-66-1142",
"jobNo": "J-10440",
"carrierId": "car_allstate",
"insuredName": "Robicheaux, Paul",
"lossType": "storm",
"phase": "mitigation",
"estimator": "Tyrell Joseph",
"location": "Houma, LA",
"rcv": 9320,
"acv": 9320,
"approvedRcv": null,
"status": "revision_requested",
"ballInCourt": "us",
"currentRound": 2,
"openedAt": "2026-06-27T13:50:23.264Z",
"submittedAt": "2026-06-29T23:26:23.264Z",
"lastActionAt": "2026-07-16T13:47:22.152Z",
"clockStartedAt": "2026-07-16T13:47:22.152Z",
"nextAction": "Answer round 2: Auditor is withholding approval pending moisture mapping and daily drying logs, and is additionally disputing the legitimacy of Overhead & Profit on this claim.",
"nextActionDue": "2026-07-18T13:47:36.024Z"
},
"carrier": "Allstate",
"aging": {
"ballInCourt": "us",
"daysHeld": 11.836274907407407,
"budgetDays": 3,
"pctOfBudget": 3.9454249691358023,
"state": "overdue",
"label": "12d held · over 3d our response window"
},
"counts": {
"revisions": 4,
"lineItems": 2,
"followups": 3,
"events": 5
}
}Next best action
AI● recommended move
Auditor returned round 2 citing Docs, Scope, O&P. Respond with justification and resubmit before the 4-day SLA expires.
ball: Our court · SLA 4d · audit 6d
Follow-up & follow-through
1 openAnswer auditor — DOCUMENTATION, SCOPE
respond · Tyrell Joseph · due Jul 3
Nudge Allstate at day 6 if no response
nudge_carrier · Tyrell Joseph · due Jul 5
Answer auditor — DOCUMENTATION, SCOPE, OP_DISPUTE
respond · Tyrell Joseph · due Jul 18
Correspondence
1 message EST-24130-MIT — submission R0 Jun 29, 11:26 PM
▲ to claims@allstate.com · XactAnalysis
Tarp + water extraction submitted day of loss.
Identity
Claim #
ALL-66-1142
Job #
J-10440
Carrier
Allstate
O&P cap
10/10
Loss / phase
storm / mitigation
Location
Houma, LA
Activity
Auditor returned R2: Auditor is withholding approval pending moisture mapping and daily drying logs, and is additionally disputing the legitimacy of Overhead & Profit on this claim.
auditor · Jul 16, 1:47 PM
R2 submitted to carrier.
Tyrell Joseph · Jul 16, 1:46 PM
Auditor returned R1: Two issues raised: (1) Documentation deficiency — moisture map and daily psychrometric readings are required to substantiate the mitigation scope and equipment utilization. Provide moisture logs with readings from each affected material and room for every day of drying. (2) O&P challenged — auditor argues job complexity is insufficient to justify GC overhead and profit. Contractor should document the number of trades coordinated, scheduling complexity, and overall project management burden to support the O&P claim.
auditor · Jul 1, 2:37 AM
R1 Submitted to carrier · Δ +9,320: Tarp + water extraction submitted day of loss.
estimator · Jun 29, 11:26 PM
Estimate EST-24130-MIT opened for Robicheaux, Paul (storm/mitigation).
Tyrell Joseph · Jun 27, 1:50 PM